This post originally appeared on the F Word: http://www.thefword.org.uk/reviews/2011/09/the_painted_lad
As a big fan of historical fiction, I was looking forward to reading Maeve Haran's The Painted Lady, which tells of the life of Frances Stuart, famous for refusing to be the mistress of Charles II. 
I first came across Frances in the original bodice-ripper, Forever Amber  by Kathleen Winsor, where she appears as a rather simpering and silly  woman who refuses Charles' advances, not out of virtue and honour, but  out of her distaste for sex. Next to the fiery and fierce Amber, Frances  unfortunately comes across as a little boring, so I was really  interested to see how different Haran's take on this character would be.
The book begins in Paris, where many cavalier families had ended  up after the Civil War, Charles II included. It is here that Frances  experiences her coup de foudre with the Duke of Richmond, who she cannot  marry since - as in so many historical novels - he needs to marry for  money and she simply doesn't have enough.
It is in Paris that Frances' great beauty also catches the eye  of the King, and soon enough she is on her way to London and court,  where she is the centre of attention and the object of the King's  attraction. Will she resist his advances? Why does she resist his  advances? Will she and the Duke of Richmond ever find happiness? The big  questions posed by the novel seem limited to these; but if you love  historical fiction like I do, you will probably want to follow Frances'  journey to find out the answers.
Along the way, we meet the nasty  and scheming Duke of Buckingham, who seems to spend all his time  plotting others' downfall for his own amusement. His cousin, the  wickedly fascinating rival for the King's attention, Barbara Palmer, is  also a central character, and is forever trying to get rid of Frances  either by complaining about her or trying to trick her into having sex  with the King. Queen Catherine, Minette, Rochester - the whole cast of  Restoration favourites - play across the page, whilst Frances Stuart  stands grand and beautiful at the centre, a player but also a canny  observer, and hero of her own battle to resist the King and find true  love.
Her story spans the period of war with Holland, the plague,  the great fire, and the comet that spelled doom for the Stuarts across  the sky. Just like Forever Amber, the episodes of the plague and the fire are some of the most exciting in the book, as they are in history.
As  a feminist, it is always interesting to see how women are portrayed in  historical fiction. While some writers, notably Philippa Gregory, have  strong feminist messages in their books, others like Jean Plaidy are  bound by sexist conventions that don't allow women in the stories much  self determination at all. Luckily, Haran is closer to Gregory when it  comes to writing strong female characters. However, Frances is a tricky  character to write for a contemporary woman to understand, and it is  here that Haran is most impressive.
Frances refuses to have sex  with a man she doesn't love (the King) for social gain and, as readers,  we respect her for standing up for her bodily autonomy. The whole  concept of royal mistresses is an interesting one for readers of  historical fiction, or history in general, when we consider what it  means for consent. Can a woman truly consent when her entire social  standing, family fortune and 'prospects' are dependent on her saying yes  to a king? This is the issue that Philippa Gregory so beautifully  delineates in The Other Boleyn Girl.  In her much loved novel, Mary imagines herself in love with the King,  but as their relationship palls, she cannot refuse to have sex with him  and must continue working as his mistress in order to secure a future  for her children, as well as to keep wealth and status being awarded to  her family. In this scenario, where she can't say no, consent is  meaningless. 
Historical fiction has a tendency to romanticise mistress culture and  paint it as desirable and sexy, as opposed to recognising it for what  it is: a financial contract for sex where consent, as we understand it,  can never really be given. In this context, women are reduced to sexual  commodities; if they refuse to enter this economy, they remain  destitute, and if they give in to it, they risk being discarded and  finding themselves 'tainted' and therefore unmarriageable. As Frances'  story shows, a woman is given little choice in the matter as Charles  threatens to rape her if she doesn't consent. So when we question what  the role of mistress really means, had she given her consent under this  social pressure, she would not really have been consenting at all.
Whilst Forever Amber  portrays Frances' celibacy as part of what she sees as her honour and  disgust for sex, Haran's Frances is much more subtle. She is a sexual  woman, who feels intense physical and sexual desire. She just doesn't  feel it for Charles, and she refuses to be his mistress because to do so  would be to betray the way she feels about herself and her sexuality.  Unlike Barbara, who is very sexual but sees sex as a means to get what  she wants, Frances wants to own her desire and her body; guarding her  virginity isn't about preserving honour and eligibility, but about  desire and love. This subtle difference lifts Haran's Frances from being  the one dimensional and asexual beauty, famed in history for refusing  the King, to being a woman of intense intelligence, emotion and feeling  who is selective and empowered in her sexuality. It's hard not to like  her and it does give the book a feminist angle in its portrayal of a  self-determined young woman surviving in a world pitted against her.
Haran  is brilliant at writing dialogue and vividly brings the female world of  the Queen's Court to life. The scenes between Barbara and Frances are  superb, and capture the rivalry between the two women perfectly, and  Haran is fantastic at portraying women's friendships, loyalties and  conversation. Frances' friend Mall is also a well-imagined character  whose own personal journey is as interesting as the main plot. One  misgiving perhaps is that Haran doesn't quite capture the atmosphere and  world of Restoration London as well as she does the lives of the women.  However the chatter, fashions, passions and laughter, as well as the  rivalry, gossiping and rumour of the court are vividly portrayed through  Frances' keen observation and witty humour.
Fans of historical  fiction with a feminist angle will enjoy this book - a great romp  through a fascinating period of history, with a strong woman at its  heart and a fulfilling end.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.